Journal of Policy Modeling

2.3k papers and 42.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Journal of Policy Modeling in the last decades have received a total of 42.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Policy Modeling usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.5k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (1.1k papers) and Finance (560 papers) specifically the topics of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (687 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (486 papers) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (437 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Policy Modeling are James B. Ang, Anthony Enisan Akinlo, Bruce E. Hansen, Dominick Salvatore, Søren Johansen, Samuel Adams, Yemane Wolde‐Rufael, Juan C. Reboredo, Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada and James E. Payne.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Policy Modeling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Policy Modeling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Policy Modeling.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Policy Modeling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Policy Modeling. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Policy Modeling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Policy Modeling more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025