Countries where authors publish in Journal of Petrology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Petrology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Petrology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Petrology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Petrology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Petrology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Petrology.
About Journal of Petrology
The 4.0k papers published in Journal of Petrology in the last decades have received a total of 330.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Petrology usually cover Geophysics (3.8k papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (460 papers), Geology (245 papers), Paleontology (297 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (3.7k papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (2.1k papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (2.0k papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (1.1k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (477 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (288 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (246 papers) and Mineralogy and Gemology Studies (187 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Petrology are Dan McKenzie, Carol D. Frost, Nigel Harris, Julian A. Pearce, A. G. Tindle, Yaoling Niu, R G Berman, R. S. J. Sparks, R. W. Le Maitre and M. J. Le Bas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.