Journal of Hospital Librarianship

660 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 660 papers published in Journal of Hospital Librarianship in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Hospital Librarianship usually cover General Health Professions (362 papers), Information Systems (125 papers) and Library and Information Sciences (89 papers) specifically the topics of Health Sciences Research and Education (259 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (112 papers) and Web and Library Services (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Hospital Librarianship are Cleo Pappas, Christine Marton, Peter Kokol, Liz Brewster, Richard James, C. Argüelles, Michael Heyd, Dee Jones, Karen Davies and Helena Blažun Vošner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Hospital Librarianship

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Hospital Librarianship. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Hospital Librarianship.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Hospital Librarianship

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Hospital Librarianship. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Hospital Librarianship with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Hospital Librarianship more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025