Journal of Children s Services

404 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 404 papers published in Journal of Children s Services in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Children s Services usually cover Clinical Psychology (227 papers), General Health Professions (138 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (108 papers) specifically the topics of Child Abuse and Trauma (112 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (85 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Children s Services are Bill Jordan, Roger Bullock, Katherine Weare, Matthew R. Sanders, Carolyn Webster‐Stratton, M. Jamila Reid, Nick Gould, Daniel F. Perkins, Judy Hutchings and Brian K. Bumbarger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Children s Services

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Children s Services. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Children s Services.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Children s Services

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Children s Services. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Children s Services with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Children s Services more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025