Journal of Anesthesia

3.1k papers and 30.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Journal of Anesthesia in the last decades have received a total of 30.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Anesthesia usually cover Surgery (1.4k papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1.1k papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (698 papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Pain Management (730 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (650 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (473 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Anesthesia are Michiaki Yamakage, Shin Kurosawa, Takuo Aoyagi, Masato Kato, Megumi Matsuda, Ru‐Rong Ji, Yul Huh, Shigeru Saito, Akiyoshi Namiki and Masahiko Kawaguchi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Anesthesia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Anesthesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Anesthesia.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Anesthesia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Anesthesia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Anesthesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Anesthesia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025