Journal of Aging & Social Policy

1.0k papers and 12.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Journal of Aging & Social Policy in the last decades have received a total of 12.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Aging & Social Policy usually cover General Health Professions (582 papers), Demography (416 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (337 papers) specifically the topics of Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (340 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (282 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (241 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Aging & Social Policy are Alan Walker, Stephen M. Golant, Carrie Henning‐Smith, Nicholas G. Castle, Edward Miller, Nancy Morrow‐Howell, Natalie Galucia, Emma Swinford, Joe C. B. Leung and Tine Buffel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Aging & Social Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Aging & Social Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Aging & Social Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Aging & Social Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Aging & Social Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Aging & Social Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Aging & Social Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025