Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu

4.1k citations
901 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu

758 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 213
  • Building and Construction 764
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 385
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 679
  • General Materials Science 77
Replace Archives of Civil Engineering with:
Archives of Civil Engineering Poland
International journal of engineering research in Africa Nigeria
Engineering Journal Thailand
Developments in the Built Environment China
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering United Kingdom
Infrastructures United States
Communications - Scientific letters of the University of Zilina Slovakia
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review China
Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences Saudi Arabia
Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN) Iraq
Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu relative to Archives of Civil Engineering Poland Archives of Civil Engineering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.2×
Archives of Civil Engineering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu.

About Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu

The 901 papers published in Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu usually cover Nuclear Energy and Engineering (12 papers), Building and Construction (129 papers), Civil and Structural Engineering (194 papers), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (86 papers) and General Materials Science (19 papers) specifically the topics of Industrial Engineering and Technologies (49 papers), Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete (34 papers), Engineering Technology and Methodologies (34 papers), Innovative concrete reinforcement materials (31 papers), Structural mechanics and materials (30 papers), Engineering and Environmental Studies (29 papers), Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability (25 papers) and Construction Management and Sustainability (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu are Vera Murgul, Saša Milojević, Alexander Nikolayevich Novikov, Elena Sofronova, Do Duc Trung, Anastasia Gennadievna Shevtsova, Nenad Zrnić, Eduard I. STAROVOITOV, Nhu-Tung Nguyen and Grigory Fedotenkov.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact