EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS

2.4k papers and 24.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS in the last decades have received a total of 24.3k indexed citations. Papers published in EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS usually cover Molecular Biology (687 papers), Genetics (418 papers) and Physiology (288 papers) specifically the topics of Animal Genetics and Reproduction (140 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (116 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (114 papers). The most active scholars publishing in EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS are Naomi Nakagata, Susumu Makino, Yoshihiro Muraoka, Ken Katagiri, Yoshihiro Tochino, Masatoshi Morimoto, Shuji Kitajima, Kunio Doi, Tsutomu Kurosawa and Masahiko Nishimura.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS.

Countries where authors publish in EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025