JBJS Open Access

478 papers and 4.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 478 papers published in JBJS Open Access in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations. Papers published in JBJS Open Access usually cover Surgery (316 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (115 papers) and Gender Studies (101 papers) specifically the topics of Diversity and Career in Medicine (101 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (92 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JBJS Open Access are Ayoade Adeyemi, Jacob M. Wilson, Javad Parvizi, Timothy L. Tan, Michael M. Kheir, Noam Shohat, Ran Schwarzkopf, Chi-Lung Chen, Matthew Kheir and Joshua C. Rozell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JBJS Open Access

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JBJS Open Access. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JBJS Open Access.

Countries where authors publish in JBJS Open Access

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JBJS Open Access. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JBJS Open Access with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JBJS Open Access more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025