International Studies

747 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 747 papers published in International Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in International Studies usually cover Political Science and International Relations (386 papers), Sociology and Political Science (226 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (122 papers) specifically the topics of Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (106 papers), International Development and Aid (88 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (82 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Studies are Kanti Bajpai, Giulio M. Gallarotti, Mohammed Nuruzzaman, Gulshan Sachdeva, Qin Yaqing, Daniel Flemes, David Scott, Barry Buzan, Rajesh Basrur and Salvador Santino F. Regilme.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Studies.

Countries where authors publish in International Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025