Head and Neck Pathology

1.6k papers and 26.2k indexed citations

About

The 1.6k papers published in Head and Neck Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 26.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Head and Neck Pathology usually cover Surgery (764 papers), Oncology (578 papers) and Oral Surgery (530 papers) specifically the topics of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (529 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (465 papers) and Tumors and Oncological Cases (314 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Head and Neck Pathology are Lester D.�R. Thompson, James S. Lewis, Raja R. Seethala, William H. Westra, Susan Müller, John M. Wright, Marilena Vered, Paul M. Speight, Justin A. Bishop and Samir K. El‐Mofty.

In The Last Decade

Head and Neck Pathology

1.5k papers receiving 25.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Head and Neck Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Head and Neck Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Head and Neck Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Head and Neck Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Head and Neck Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Head and Neck Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Head and Neck Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026