IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering

324 papers and 18.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 324 papers published in IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 18.3k indexed citations. Papers published in IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering usually cover Biomedical Engineering (137 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (59 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (57 papers) specifically the topics of EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (42 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (34 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering are Milan Sonka, Michael D. Abràmoff, Mona K. Garvin, Yu Mike, Tzyy‐Ping Jung, Gert Cauwenberghs, Anant Madabhushi, Laura E. Boucheron, Ali Can and Bülent Yener.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

Countries where authors publish in IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025