Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources

3.3k citations
387 papers · · active since 2006

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments 91
    • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases 18
    • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research 14
    • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics 161

Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources

340 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.3k
  • Surgery 1.1k
  • Health Informatics 33
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 260
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 319
Replace JACC Asia with:
JACC Asia China
Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology United States
Cardiology and Therapy United States
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research India
The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal United States
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra Japan
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review United States
Drugs in Context United States
Medical Devices Evidence and Research United States
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring United States
Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources relative to JACC Asia China JACC Asia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×23.4×
JACC Asia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources.

About Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources

The 387 papers published in Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources in the last decades have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (149 papers), Surgery (172 papers), Internal Medicine (5 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (37 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (20 papers) specifically the topics of Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (161 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (91 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (18 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (17 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (14 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (10 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (9 papers) and Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications (8 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Interventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources are Colin Berry, Arjun Kumar Ghosh, Jun Hua Chong, Thomas Joseph Ford, Peter D. O’Kane, Jacqueline Saw, Angela Hoye, Jehangir N. Din, Davide Capodanno and Thomas Modine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact