Ichthyological Research

1.6k papers and 15.1k indexed citations

About

The 1.6k papers published in Ichthyological Research in the last decades have received a total of 15.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Ichthyological Research usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.2k papers), Aquatic Science (761 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (561 papers) specifically the topics of Ichthyology and Marine Biology (698 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (690 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (619 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ichthyological Research are Tetsuji Nakabo, Mutsumi Nishida, Akira Gotō, Seishi Kimura, Hiroyuki Motomura, Katsutoshi Watanabe, Jeffrey M. Leis, Mitsuhiko Sano, Tetsumi Takahashi and Yukio Iwatsuki.

In The Last Decade

Ichthyological Research

1.4k papers receiving 14.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Ichthyological Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ichthyological Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ichthyological Research.

Countries where authors publish in Ichthyological Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ichthyological Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ichthyological Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ichthyological Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026