Huisarts en Wetenschap

1.7k papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Huisarts en Wetenschap in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Huisarts en Wetenschap usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (479 papers), General Health Professions (342 papers) and Epidemiology (189 papers) specifically the topics of Clinical practice guidelines implementation (221 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (129 papers) and Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Huisarts en Wetenschap are Paul Giesen, Lea Jabaaij, François Schellevis, Richard Grol, Chris van Weel, Berend Terluin, Henriëtte van der Horst, Geertruida H. de Bock, Sandra van Dulmen and Niek J. de Wit.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Huisarts en Wetenschap

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Huisarts en Wetenschap. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Huisarts en Wetenschap.

Countries where authors publish in Huisarts en Wetenschap

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Huisarts en Wetenschap. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Huisarts en Wetenschap with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Huisarts en Wetenschap more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025