Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

290 papers and 4.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 290 papers published in Hague Journal on the Rule of Law in the last decades have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Hague Journal on the Rule of Law usually cover Political Science and International Relations (201 papers), Law (141 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (101 papers) specifically the topics of Judicial and Constitutional Studies (106 papers), European and International Law Studies (76 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Hague Journal on the Rule of Law are Daniel Kaufmann, Massimo Mastruzzi, Aart Kraay, Adriaan Bedner, Kathryn Hendley, Tom Gerald Daly, Julio Faúndez, Wojciech Sadurski, Laurent Pech and Brian Ζ. Tamanaha.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Hague Journal on the Rule of Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Hague Journal on the Rule of Law.

Countries where authors publish in Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Hague Journal on the Rule of Law. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Hague Journal on the Rule of Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hague Journal on the Rule of Law more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025