Ge-conservacion

292 papers and 624 indexed citations i.

About

The 292 papers published in Ge-conservacion in the last decades have received a total of 624 indexed citations. Papers published in Ge-conservacion usually cover Conservation (169 papers), Archeology (154 papers) and Earth-Surface Processes (89 papers) specifically the topics of Conservation Techniques and Studies (128 papers), Building materials and conservation (89 papers) and Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ge-conservacion are Margarita San Andrés Moya, Jorge Otero, A. Elena Charola, Silvia García Fernández-Villa, Rafael Fort González, Pilar Ortiz, Eusebio Cano Carmona, Duygu Ergenç, Teresa Palomar and Blanca Ramírez Barat.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ge-conservacion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ge-conservacion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ge-conservacion.

Countries where authors publish in Ge-conservacion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ge-conservacion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ge-conservacion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ge-conservacion more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025