Health and Human Rights

285 papers and 3.5k indexed citations

About

The 285 papers published in Health and Human Rights in the last decades have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Health and Human Rights usually cover Sociology and Political Science (177 papers), General Health Professions (90 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (59 papers) specifically the topics of Human Rights and Development (116 papers), International Human Rights and Reproductive Law (40 papers) and Health and Conflict Studies (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health and Human Rights are Virginia A. Leary, Alice Miller, Leslie London, Alicia Ely Yamin, Jonathan M. Mann, Paul Farmer, Paul Hunt, Jonathan Mann, Joanna Busza and Carmel Shalev.

In The Last Decade

Health and Human Rights

250 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Fields of papers published in Health and Human Rights

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health and Human Rights. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health and Human Rights.

Countries where authors publish in Health and Human Rights

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health and Human Rights. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health and Human Rights with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health and Human Rights more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026