Psychoanalysis Culture & Society

631 papers and 2.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 631 papers published in Psychoanalysis Culture & Society in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychoanalysis Culture & Society usually cover Clinical Psychology (285 papers), Sociology and Political Science (223 papers) and Social Psychology (76 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (139 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (122 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychoanalysis Culture & Society are Stephen Frosh, Lynne Layton, Paul Hoggett, Jason Glynos, Ian Parker, Lisa Baraitser, Derek Hook, Wendy Hollway, Yannis Stavrakakis and Frédéric Declercq.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychoanalysis Culture & Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychoanalysis Culture & Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychoanalysis Culture & Society.

Countries where authors publish in Psychoanalysis Culture & Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychoanalysis Culture & Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychoanalysis Culture & Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychoanalysis Culture & Society more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025