Global Constitutionalism

1.7k citations
286 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Law top 5%
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
    • International Law and Human Rights
    • Global Peace and Security Dynamics
    • Political Philosophy and Ethics
    • European Union Policy and Governance

Papers in

  • Law 140
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies 119
    • International Law and Human Rights 95
    • Political Philosophy and Ethics 43
    • Global Peace and Security Dynamics 29
    • European and International Law Studies 28
    • European Union Policy and Governance 19

Global Constitutionalism

233 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Global Constitutionalism
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Law 506
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.2k
  • Development 138
  • Sociology and Political Science 633
  • History 143
Replace Hague Journal on the Rule of Law with:
Hague Journal on the Rule of Law United Kingdom
Chicago journal of international law United States
Harvard international law journal United States
Ethics & Global Politics United States
Columbia journal of transnational law United States
International Community Law Review United Kingdom
Nordic Journal of Human Rights Norway
Theoretical Inquiries in Law United States
Journal of Global Ethics United States
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs Australia
Global Constitutionalism relative to Hague Journal on the Rule of Law United Kingdom Hague Journal on the Rule of Law's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Hague Journal on the Rule of Law · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Global Constitutionalism

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Constitutionalism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Constitutionalism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Constitutionalism more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Global Constitutionalism

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Constitutionalism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Constitutionalism.

About Global Constitutionalism

The 286 papers published in Global Constitutionalism in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Global Constitutionalism usually cover Law (140 papers), Political Science and International Relations (226 papers), Development (9 papers), Sociology and Political Science (105 papers) and Strategy and Management (32 papers) specifically the topics of Judicial and Constitutional Studies (119 papers), International Law and Human Rights (95 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (43 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (29 papers), European and International Law Studies (28 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (25 papers), Human Rights and Development (21 papers) and European Union Policy and Governance (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Constitutionalism are Michael Barnett, Peer C. Zumbansen, Garrett Wallace Brown, Christian Kreuder‐Sonnen, Antje Wiener, Anthony F. Lang, Seyla Benhabib, Martin Loughlin, James H. Tully and Mattias Kumm.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact