Global Media and China

244 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 244 papers published in Global Media and China in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Global Media and China usually cover Sociology and Political Science (140 papers), Communication (79 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (56 papers) specifically the topics of Media Studies and Communication (57 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (41 papers) and Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Media and China are Alice Yuet Lin Lee, Wanning Sun, Terry Flew, Yan Su, Amy Shields Dobson, Colin Sparks, Hongwei Bao, Xu Song, Hiroko Okuda and Dani Madrid‐Morales.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Global Media and China

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Media and China. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Media and China.

Countries where authors publish in Global Media and China

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Media and China. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Media and China with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Media and China more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025