This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geochemistry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Geochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geochemistry.
About Geochemistry
The 1.1k papers published in Geochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 24.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Geochemistry usually cover Geochemistry and Petrology (265 papers), Geophysics (469 papers), Pollution (69 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (124 papers) and Paleontology (46 papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (461 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (190 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (117 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (78 papers), Heavy metals in environment (65 papers), Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (60 papers), Geochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits (48 papers) and Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geochemistry are Klaus Keil, Richard J. Walker, Corby Anderson, Allan H. Treiman, G. Jeffrey Taylor, Jörg Matschullat, Frank Zimmermann, Stefan Erasmi, Cornelius Oertel and W. H. O. Ernst.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.