Funkcialaj Ekvacioj

331 papers and 2.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 331 papers published in Funkcialaj Ekvacioj in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Funkcialaj Ekvacioj usually cover Applied Mathematics (206 papers), Mathematical Physics (135 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (103 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (94 papers), Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (84 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Funkcialaj Ekvacioj are Rico Zacher, Yoshio Tsutsumi, Raimundas Vidūnas, Tadahiro Oh, Nobuyoshi Fukagai, Kimiaki Narukawa, Masayuki Itô, Masahito Ohta, Yoshihiro Shibata and Tetsu Masuda.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Funkcialaj Ekvacioj

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Funkcialaj Ekvacioj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Funkcialaj Ekvacioj.

Countries where authors publish in Funkcialaj Ekvacioj

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Funkcialaj Ekvacioj. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Funkcialaj Ekvacioj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Funkcialaj Ekvacioj more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025