Frontiers in Psychology

39.8k papers and 639.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 39.8k papers published in Frontiers in Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 639.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers in Psychology usually cover Social Psychology (11.7k papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (10.5k papers) and Clinical Psychology (9.0k papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2.1k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2.0k papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Psychology are Daniël Lakens, Zoltán Dienes, Ernesto Panadero, Annamaria Di Fabio, Julian F. Thayer, Bernhard Hommel, Laura R. Marusich, Jonathan Z. Bakdash, Ming Kuo and Cheng‐Min Chao.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025