Frontiers in Neurology

15.4k papers and 193.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 15.4k papers published in Frontiers in Neurology in the last decades have received a total of 193.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers in Neurology usually cover Neurology (5.9k papers), Epidemiology (3.4k papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (2.7k papers) specifically the topics of Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2.0k papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1.3k papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Neurology are Maria Cristina Morganti-Kossmann, Ian S. Curthoys, Joaquim Cerejeira, EB Mukaetova-Ladinska, L. Lagarto, Thomas Woodcock, Arsalan Alizadeh, Soheila Karimi‐Abdolrezaee, Scott M. Dyck and Denes V. Agoston.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Neurology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Neurology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Neurology.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Neurology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Neurology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Neurology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Neurology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025