Forum for Social Economics

521 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 521 papers published in Forum for Social Economics in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Forum for Social Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (244 papers), Sociology and Political Science (158 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (82 papers) specifically the topics of Economic Theory and Institutions (127 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (69 papers) and Political Economy and Marxism (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forum for Social Economics are Myron Orfield, Peterson K Ozili, Franklin Obeng‐Odoom, Wolfram Elsner, Arthur Smithies, Sonja Grabner‐Kräuter, Mark D. White, John Powell, Simplice Asongu and Francesco Burchi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forum for Social Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forum for Social Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forum for Social Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Forum for Social Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forum for Social Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forum for Social Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forum for Social Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025