Fortschritte der Physik

1.6k papers and 22.0k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Fortschritte der Physik in the last decades have received a total of 22.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Fortschritte der Physik usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (871 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (553 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (532 papers) specifically the topics of Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (706 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (477 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (292 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fortschritte der Physik are David P. DiVincenzo, Leonard Susskind, H. Kleinert, Hans Ludwig Joos, Elias Kiritsis, Marcos Mariño, N. N. Bogoljubov, Dieter Lüst, Olaf Hohm and Bert Schroer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Fortschritte der Physik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fortschritte der Physik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fortschritte der Physik.

Countries where authors publish in Fortschritte der Physik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fortschritte der Physik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fortschritte der Physik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fortschritte der Physik more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026