Forest Science and Technology

475 papers and 3.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 475 papers published in Forest Science and Technology in the last decades have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Forest Science and Technology usually cover Global and Planetary Change (183 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (162 papers) and Plant Science (154 papers) specifically the topics of Forest ecology and management (122 papers), Forest Management and Policy (67 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forest Science and Technology are Su Young Woo, Young Jin Lee, Cheol-Min Kim, Ram P. Sharma, Byung Bae Park, Han Sh, Inkyin Khaine, Se Bin Kim, Johannes Breidenbach and Woo‐Kyun Lee.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forest Science and Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forest Science and Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forest Science and Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Forest Science and Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forest Science and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forest Science and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forest Science and Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025