Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

2.0k papers and 27.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica in the last decades have received a total of 27.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica usually cover Physiology (752 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (502 papers) and Speech and Hearing (372 papers) specifically the topics of Voice and Speech Disorders (731 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (487 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (345 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica are Erkki Vilkman, Minoru Hirano, Lena Hartelius, Jennifer Oates, Nobuhiko Isshiki, H.K. Schutte, Johan Sundberg, Ronald W. Wendahl, Anne-Maria Laukkanen and Jeri A. Logemann.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

Countries where authors publish in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025