Financial History Review

367 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 367 papers published in Financial History Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Financial History Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (184 papers), Finance (151 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (89 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Economic and Social Studies (119 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (86 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Financial History Review are Larry Neal, C. A. E. Goodhart, Luca Fantacci, Michelangelo Vasta, Marc Flandreau, Daniel Waldenström, Pierre-Cyrille Hautcœur, Bruno S. Frey, Farley Grubb and John D. Turner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Financial History Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Financial History Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Financial History Review.

Countries where authors publish in Financial History Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Financial History Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Financial History Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Financial History Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025