Fresenius environmental bulletin

1.6k papers and 7.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Fresenius environmental bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Fresenius environmental bulletin usually cover Plant Science (315 papers), Water Science and Technology (180 papers) and Pollution (155 papers) specifically the topics of Heavy metals in environment (72 papers), Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (70 papers) and Water Quality and Pollution Assessment (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fresenius environmental bulletin are Ante Barić, Stanislav Frančišković-Bilinski, Tomislav Zvonarić, K. A. Skibniewska, Chicgoua Noubactep, Mehmet Doğan, Alina Kabata‐Pendias, Ivana Ujević, Hasan Akgül and Мustafa Sevindik.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Fresenius environmental bulletin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fresenius environmental bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fresenius environmental bulletin.

Countries where authors publish in Fresenius environmental bulletin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fresenius environmental bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fresenius environmental bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fresenius environmental bulletin more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025