Exploration and Mining Geology

310 papers and 3.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 310 papers published in Exploration and Mining Geology in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Exploration and Mining Geology usually cover Artificial Intelligence (214 papers), Geophysics (189 papers) and Geochemistry and Petrology (54 papers) specifically the topics of Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (213 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (164 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Exploration and Mining Geology are Emmanuel John M. Carranza, Lawrence D. Meinert, Marcos Zentilli, Víctor Maksaev, Patrick J. Williams, Timothy J. Barrett, Clifford R. Stanley, Amit Porwal, Louis J. Cabri and Marat Abzalov.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Exploration and Mining Geology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Exploration and Mining Geology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Exploration and Mining Geology.

Countries where authors publish in Exploration and Mining Geology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Exploration and Mining Geology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Exploration and Mining Geology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Exploration and Mining Geology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025