Evolution Education and Outreach

529 papers and 6.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 529 papers published in Evolution Education and Outreach in the last decades have received a total of 6.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Evolution Education and Outreach usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (326 papers), Social Psychology (232 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (119 papers) specifically the topics of Evolution and Science Education (308 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (213 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evolution Education and Outreach are T. Ryan Gregory, Ryosuke Motani, Ross H. Nehm, Kenneth J. McNamara, Louis S. Nadelson, Anastasia Thanukos, Kathryn A. Hanley, Louise S. Mead, Niles Eldredge and Isabel Sanmartín.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Evolution Education and Outreach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evolution Education and Outreach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evolution Education and Outreach.

Countries where authors publish in Evolution Education and Outreach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evolution Education and Outreach. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evolution Education and Outreach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evolution Education and Outreach more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025