Endoscopic Ultrasound

859 papers and 8.6k indexed citations

About

The 859 papers published in Endoscopic Ultrasound in the last decades have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Endoscopic Ultrasound usually cover Surgery (596 papers), Oncology (481 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (434 papers) specifically the topics of Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (452 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (234 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (202 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Endoscopic Ultrasound are Marc Giovannini, DouglasG Adler, Adrian Săftoiu, ChristophF Dietrich, Julio Iglesias‐García, Michael Hocke, A Ignee, ChristophF Dietrich, Peter Vilmann and Malay Sharma.

In The Last Decade

Endoscopic Ultrasound

799 papers receiving 8.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Endoscopic Ultrasound

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Endoscopic Ultrasound. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Endoscopic Ultrasound.

Countries where authors publish in Endoscopic Ultrasound

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Endoscopic Ultrasound. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Endoscopic Ultrasound with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Endoscopic Ultrasound more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026