ESC Heart Failure

2.8k papers and 29.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in ESC Heart Failure in the last decades have received a total of 29.2k indexed citations. Papers published in ESC Heart Failure usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (2.2k papers), Surgery (547 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (428 papers) specifically the topics of Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1.2k papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (865 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (373 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ESC Heart Failure are Stefan D. Anker, Tiny Jaarsma, Stefan D. Anker, Martín Cowie, Gerasimos Filippatos, Carolyn S.P. Lam, Piotr Ponikowski, Marco Metra, Jochen Springer and Stephan von Haehling.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ESC Heart Failure

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ESC Heart Failure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ESC Heart Failure.

Countries where authors publish in ESC Heart Failure

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ESC Heart Failure. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ESC Heart Failure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ESC Heart Failure more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025