Environmental Biology of Fishes

5.2k papers and 130.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.2k papers published in Environmental Biology of Fishes in the last decades have received a total of 130.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Biology of Fishes usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.0k papers), Ecology (2.3k papers) and Aquatic Science (2.1k papers) specifically the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (3.4k papers), Marine and fisheries research (1.9k papers) and Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (1.8k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Biology of Fishes are Donald L. Kramer, Eugene K. Balon, Allen Keast, D. H. Cushing, Robert E. Johannes, John A. Endler, Phillip S. Lobel, Alan K. Whitfield, Peter F. Sale and Colin A. Simpfendorfer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Biology of Fishes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Biology of Fishes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Biology of Fishes.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Biology of Fishes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Biology of Fishes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Biology of Fishes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Biology of Fishes more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025