Environmental Microbiome

339 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 339 papers published in Environmental Microbiome in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Microbiome usually cover Ecology (175 papers), Plant Science (123 papers) and Molecular Biology (110 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (135 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (56 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Microbiome are Rolf Daniel, Torsten Thomas, Franziska Wemheuer, Emma L. Johnston, Peter Meinicke, Jessica A. Taylor, Bernd Wemheuer, Donghui Wen, Weidong Chen and Gavin Lear.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Microbiome

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Microbiome. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Microbiome.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Microbiome

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Microbiome. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Microbiome with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Microbiome more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025