Countries where authors publish in Ear Nose & Throat Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ear Nose & Throat Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ear Nose & Throat Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ear Nose & Throat Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Ear Nose & Throat Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Ear Nose & Throat Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ear Nose & Throat Journal.
About Ear Nose & Throat Journal
The 5.5k papers published in Ear Nose & Throat Journal in the last decades have received a total of 37.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Ear Nose & Throat Journal usually cover Otorhinolaryngology (1.3k papers), Sensory Systems (362 papers), Oral Surgery (463 papers), Surgery (2.5k papers) and Rheumatology (633 papers) specifically the topics of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (750 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (596 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (571 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (558 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (544 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (442 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (418 papers) and Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (409 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ear Nose & Throat Journal are Lester D.�R. Thompson, Jack L. Pulec, Eiji Yanagisawa, Robert T. Sataloff, Herbert Silverstein, Enrique Palacios, Cosimo de Filippis, Andrea Lovato, Dewey A. Christmas and Dale H. Rice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.