English Language Teaching

2.6k papers and 18.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in English Language Teaching in the last decades have received a total of 18.9k indexed citations. Papers published in English Language Teaching usually cover Language and Linguistics (1.5k papers), Literature and Literary Theory (1.1k papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (984 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (1.3k papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (825 papers) and Second Language Acquisition and Learning (684 papers). The most active scholars publishing in English Language Teaching are Muhammad Ishtiaq, James Scotland, Alireza Jalilifar, Abbas Pourhosein Gilakjani, Fakieh Alrabai, Melor Md Yunus, Narjes Banou Sabouri, Jayakaran Mukundan, Zohreh R. Eslami and Lưu Trọng Tuấn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in English Language Teaching

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in English Language Teaching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in English Language Teaching.

Countries where authors publish in English Language Teaching

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in English Language Teaching. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in English Language Teaching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites English Language Teaching more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025