Economic and political weekly

2.0k papers and 15.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Economic and political weekly in the last decades have received a total of 15.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Economic and political weekly usually cover Sociology and Political Science (565 papers), Economics and Econometrics (380 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (371 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Economic Development in India (284 papers), Agricultural Economics and Practices (260 papers) and South Asian Studies and Conflicts (204 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Economic and political weekly are Jean Drèze, Angus Deaton, Michael M. Cernea, James Scott, N. S. Jodha, Ranjan Ray, John Harriss, Ramesh Chand, Shireen Jejeebhoy and Amartya Sen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Economic and political weekly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Economic and political weekly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Economic and political weekly.

Countries where authors publish in Economic and political weekly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Economic and political weekly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Economic and political weekly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economic and political weekly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025