Echocardiography

6.0k papers and 56.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.0k papers published in Echocardiography in the last decades have received a total of 56.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Echocardiography usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (4.6k papers), Surgery (1.9k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2.3k papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (1.7k papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Echocardiography are Navin C. Nanda, Peter J. Czuwala, Michel Schneider, Edmund Kenneth Kerut, Jeffrey J. Silbiger, Gail ter Haar, Roberto M. Lang, Natesa G. Pandian, Matthew W. Miller and John D. Bonagura.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Echocardiography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Echocardiography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Echocardiography.

Countries where authors publish in Echocardiography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Echocardiography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Echocardiography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Echocardiography more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025