East European Jewish Affairs

405 papers and 701 indexed citations i.

About

The 405 papers published in East European Jewish Affairs in the last decades have received a total of 701 indexed citations. Papers published in East European Jewish Affairs usually cover Sociology and Political Science (282 papers), Political Science and International Relations (200 papers) and Demography (81 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (208 papers), Soviet and Russian History (81 papers) and Jewish Identity and Society (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in East European Jewish Affairs are Shaul Stampfer, Jovan Byford, John‐Paul Himka, Dovid Katz, Robert J. Brym, Michael Berkowitz, Fran Markowitz, Theodore R. Weeks, Larissa Remennick and François Guesnet.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in East European Jewish Affairs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in East European Jewish Affairs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in East European Jewish Affairs.

Countries where authors publish in East European Jewish Affairs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in East European Jewish Affairs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in East European Jewish Affairs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites East European Jewish Affairs more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025