disP - The Planning Review

835 papers and 4.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 835 papers published in disP - The Planning Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in disP - The Planning Review usually cover Urban Studies (230 papers), Political Science and International Relations (170 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (141 papers) specifically the topics of Urbanization and City Planning (117 papers), Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies (90 papers) and Urban Planning and Governance (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in disP - The Planning Review are Klaus R. Kunzmann, Simin Davoudi, Dominic Stead, Vincent Nadin, Andreas Faludi, Alessandro Balducci, Constance Carr, Ward Rauws, Luca Bertolini and Louis Albrechts.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in disP - The Planning Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in disP - The Planning Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in disP - The Planning Review.

Countries where authors publish in disP - The Planning Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in disP - The Planning Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in disP - The Planning Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites disP - The Planning Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025