Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

11.3k papers and 361.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 11.3k papers published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum in the last decades have received a total of 361.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum usually cover Surgery (8.2k papers), Oncology (5.1k papers) and Rheumatology (2.2k papers) specifically the topics of Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3.8k papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (2.8k papers) and Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (2.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum are Steven D. Wexner, Victor W. Fazio, James M. Church, David A. Rothenberger, Robert W. Beart, Joe J. Tjandra, Herand Abcarian, Ian C. Lavery, Robin S. McLeod and Robert D. Madoff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

Countries where authors publish in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diseases of the Colon & Rectum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025