Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

1.5k citations
229 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
    • Political Conflict and Governance
    • Social and Intergroup Psychology
    • Crime Patterns and Interventions
    • Misinformation and Its Impacts
    • Social Media and Politics

Papers in

    • Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence 124
    • Political Conflict and Governance 72
    • Social and Intergroup Psychology 31
    • Crime Patterns and Interventions 18
    • Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance 17
    • Peacebuilding and International Security 13
    • Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 11
    • Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East 16

Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

187 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.2k
  • Communication 118
  • Political Science and International Relations 269
  • Social Psychology 190
  • Health 68
Replace Anthropology in Action with:
Anthropology in Action United Kingdom
Cosmopolitan Civil Societies An Interdisciplinary Journal Australia
Journal of Organizational Ethnography United Kingdom
Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression United States
Journal of Policing Intelligence and Counter Terrorism Australia
IJAR – International Journal of Action Research Germany
Boston University law review United States
Korea Journal South Korea
Journal of Strategic Security United States
Emory law journal United States
Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict relative to Anthropology in Action United Kingdom Anthropology in Action's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Anthropology in Action · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict.

About Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

The 229 papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict usually cover Sociology and Political Science (187 papers), Political Science and International Relations (61 papers), Communication (14 papers), General Social Sciences (3 papers) and Social Psychology (18 papers) specifically the topics of Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (124 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (72 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (31 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (18 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (17 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (16 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (13 papers) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict are Clark McCauley, James W. Pennebaker, James A. Piazza, Kurt Braddock, Gary LaFree, Victor Asal, Lucian Gideon Conway, Marc Howard Ross, Ifat Maoz and Adrian Cherney.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact