Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

1.4k citations
216 papers · · active since 2008

Impact in

Papers in

    • Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence 125
    • Political Conflict and Governance 34
    • Social and Intergroup Psychology 14
    • Irish and British Studies 9
    • Peacebuilding and International Security 8
    • Conflict Management and Negotiation 8
    • International Relations and Foreign Policy 12
    • Military History and Strategy 8

Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

192 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
  • General Social Sciences 31
  • Linguistics and Language 35
  • Political Science and International Relations 206
  • Communication 53
Replace L Année sociologique with:
L Année sociologique France
Empiria Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales Spain
Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression United States
European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology Finland
The Tocqueville Review/La revue Tocqueville France
Cahiers internationaux de sociologie France
Swiss Journal of Sociology Switzerland
Intersections Hungary
Cosmopolitan Civil Societies An Interdisciplinary Journal Australia
Polish Sociological Review Poland
Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict relative to L Année sociologique France L Année sociologique's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
L Année sociologique · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict.

About Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

The 216 papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict usually cover Sociology and Political Science (190 papers), Political Science and International Relations (44 papers), Communication (6 papers), Linguistics and Language (2 papers) and Philosophy (6 papers) specifically the topics of Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (125 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (34 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (12 papers), Irish and British Studies (9 papers), Military History and Strategy (8 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (8 papers) and Conflict Management and Negotiation (8 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict are Clark R. McCauley, James W. Pennebaker, James A. Piazza, Kurt H. Braddock, Gary D. Lafree, Victor H. Asal, Lucian Gideon Conway, Ifat Maoz, Adrian Cherney and Metin N. Gürcan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact