Current Problems in Dermatology

342 papers and 3.9k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 342 papers published in Current Problems in Dermatology in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Problems in Dermatology usually cover Dermatology (134 papers), Epidemiology (45 papers) and Surgery (44 papers) specifically the topics of Dermatology and Skin Diseases (35 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (31 papers) and Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Problems in Dermatology are A. B. G. Lansdown, Peter Elsner, Terri L. Meinking, Howard I. Maïbach, Nancy B. Esterly, F. Dreher, Lester Packer, Vered Molho‐Pessach, Peter Groscurth and Jens J. Thiele.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Problems in Dermatology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Problems in Dermatology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Problems in Dermatology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Problems in Dermatology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Problems in Dermatology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Problems in Dermatology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Problems in Dermatology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026