Current Issues in Auditing

242 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 242 papers published in Current Issues in Auditing in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Issues in Auditing usually cover Accounting (198 papers), Management Information Systems (60 papers) and Strategy and Management (44 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (190 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (45 papers) and Accounting Education and Careers (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Issues in Auditing are W. Robert Knechel, David N. Herda, J. Efrim Boritz, Steven M. Glover, Won Gyun No, Douglas F. Prawitt, Jennifer Xu, Kean Wu, Manlu Liu and Dana R. Hermanson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Issues in Auditing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Issues in Auditing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Issues in Auditing.

Countries where authors publish in Current Issues in Auditing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Issues in Auditing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Issues in Auditing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Issues in Auditing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025