Current Bioactive Compounds

787 papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 787 papers published in Current Bioactive Compounds in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Bioactive Compounds usually cover Molecular Biology (220 papers), Organic Chemistry (208 papers) and Plant Science (185 papers) specifically the topics of Synthesis and biological activity (121 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (83 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Bioactive Compounds are Satyamaheshwar Peddibhotla, Sherry R. Chemler, Miguel A. González, Edgardo N. Durantini, Catherine Fernandez, Elena Ormeño, Yang Liu, Xuan Tian, Dinesh Kumar Patel and Gianfranco Fontana.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Bioactive Compounds

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Bioactive Compounds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Bioactive Compounds.

Countries where authors publish in Current Bioactive Compounds

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Bioactive Compounds. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Bioactive Compounds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Bioactive Compounds more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025