This map shows the geographic impact of research published in CRANIO®. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in CRANIO® with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CRANIO® more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in CRANIO®. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in CRANIO®.
About CRANIO®
The 1.9k papers published in CRANIO® in the last decades have received a total of 28.3k indexed citations . Papers published in CRANIO® usually cover Complementary and Manual Therapy (1.2k papers), Orthodontics (282 papers), Rheumatology (353 papers), Neurology (334 papers) and Oral Surgery (149 papers) specifically the topics of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (1.2k papers), Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (267 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (224 papers), Oropharyngeal Anatomy and Pathologies (215 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (169 papers), Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (122 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (95 papers) and Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in CRANIO® are Wesley E. Shankland, Daniele Manfredini, Robert Barry Kerstein, Mariano Rocabado, Barry C. Cooper, John C. Radke, Aune M. Raustia, Howard W. Makofsky, Luca Guarda‐Nardini and Gunnar E. Carlsson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.