This map shows the geographic impact of research published in CORROSION. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in CORROSION with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CORROSION more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in CORROSION. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in CORROSION.
About CORROSION
The 12.2k papers published in CORROSION in the last decades have received a total of 192.6k indexed citations . Papers published in CORROSION usually cover Metals and Alloys (4.5k papers), Materials Chemistry (6.9k papers), Ecological Modeling (163 papers), Mechanical Engineering (1.9k papers) and Aerospace Engineering (783 papers) specifically the topics of Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (6.3k papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (4.5k papers), Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis (986 papers), High-Temperature Coating Behaviors (519 papers), Concrete Corrosion and Durability (492 papers), High Temperature Alloys and Creep (261 papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (253 papers) and Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms (228 papers). The most active scholars publishing in CORROSION are Florian B. Mansfeld, Srdjan Nešić, John R. Scully, N. Birbilis, Robert E. Melchers, Z. Szklarska‐Śmiałowska, Chia‐Hung Hsu, Peter L. Andresen, Martin W Kendig and Redvers N. Parkins.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.